Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 – 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense<\/title>\n <meta name=\"description\" content=\"Chelsea had 67% possession but only scraped a 2-1 win against West Ham. More possession than a politician has hot air, but was it enough? #BritishHumour #FootballAnalysis #PremierLeague\">\n \n \n <meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"website\">\n <meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 - 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense\">\n <meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chelsea had 67% possession but only scraped a 2-1 win against West Ham. More possession than a politician has hot air, but was it enough? #BritishHumour #FootballAnalysis #PremierLeague\">\n <meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/02\/fdb037d7a7e5213c9b66c40ad8b91dc4144bee6e182a6c7cf49b7018784906d4_en_2025-02-CHELSEA-WEST-HAM-match_statistics_match.png\">\n\n \n <meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\">\n <meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 - 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense\">\n <meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Chelsea had 67% possession but only scraped a 2-1 win against West Ham. More possession than a politician has hot air, but was it enough? #BritishHumour #FootballAnalysis #PremierLeague\">\n <meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/02\/fdb037d7a7e5213c9b66c40ad8b91dc4144bee6e182a6c7cf49b7018784906d4_en_2025-02-CHELSEA-WEST-HAM-match_statistics_match.png\">\n\n <style>\n body { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 1200px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 20px; }\n table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin: 20px 0; }\n th, td { padding: 12px; text-align: center; border: 1px solid #ddd; }\n th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }\n .stats-container { display: grid; grid-gap: 20px; }\n .video-wrapper { position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden; max-width: 100%; }\n .video-wrapper iframe { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; }\n .highlight-green { background-color: #e6ffe6; }\n .highlight-red { background-color: #ffe6e6; }\n img { border-radius: 8px; margin: 20px 0; }\n <\/style>\n <\/head>\n <body>\n <article itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/SportsEvent\">\n <header>\n <h1 itemprop=\"name\">Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 – 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense<\/h1>\n <\/header>\n\n <section>\n <h2>Chelsea Edge Past West Ham: Tactical Masterclass or Just Plain Lucky, Mate?<\/h2>\n<p>Blimey, Chelsea, with a frankly ludicrous 67% possession, almost bottled it against West Ham! A squeaky 2-1 victory at Stamford Bridge \u2013 was it tactical genius or just a bit of jammy good fortune? Are the Blues genuine contenders, or are we just seeing Harry Kane’s trophy cabinet vibes all over again?<\/p>\n<p><strong>The 3 Keys to the Match<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Possession is Nine Tenths of the Law\u2026 Except When It Isn’t:<\/strong> Chelsea hogged the ball like they were auditioning for a Pep Guardiola tribute act, but struggled to break down a stubborn West Ham defence. All that possession, and for what? More cutting edge needed, pronto.<\/li>\n<li><strong>West Ham ‘Parking the Bus’ and Almost Getting Away With It:<\/strong> With a measly 33% possession, West Ham played on the counter like their lives depended on it. Their goal, a textbook smash and grab, nearly silenced Stamford Bridge. Almost pulled off the heist of the century!<\/li>\n<li><strong>Chelsea’s Late Show \u2013 Just About Good Enough:<\/strong> Going behind seemed to finally wake Chelsea up in the second half. The goals eventually came, but it was hardly a walk in the park. You’d expect a bit more swagger from a team chasing Champions League spots.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>The Bonkers Stat<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Zero offsides for Chelsea! For a team with that much of the ball, it’s frankly baffling. Perfect positional play, or just a lack of risk-taking and runs in behind? You decide.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tags :<\/strong> Chelsea, West Ham, Premier League, Football, Analysis, Tactics, Possession, Goals, Stamford Bridge<\/p>\n <\/section>\n\n <section aria-label=\"Detailed Match\">\n <h2>Detailed Match<\/h2>\n <table>\n <tr>\n <th scope=\"col\">Stadium<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Type<\/th>\n <\/tr>\n <tr>\n <td itemprop=\"location\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/StadiumOrArena\">\n <span itemprop=\"name\">Stamford Bridge<\/span>\n <\/td>\n <td>Premier League<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n <\/section>\n\n\n <div style=\"width: 40%; margin: 0 auto;\">\n \n <figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-9-16 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n <div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n <iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"#CHEWHU Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 - 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/BxKBVNsZaB4?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n <\/div>\n <\/figure>\n \n <\/div>\n\n\n <section aria-label=\"Team Statistics\">\n <h2>Team Statistics<\/h2>\n <table>\n <thead>\n <tr>\n <th scope=\"col\">Team<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Score<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Possession (%)<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Total Shots<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Corners<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Offside<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Who put the ball in the net?<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Goals<\/th>\n <\/tr>\n <\/thead>\n <tbody>\n <tr>\n <td itemprop=\"homeTeam\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/SportsTeam\">\n <span itemprop=\"name\">CHELSEA<\/span>\n <\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">2<\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">67%<\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">21<\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">4<\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">0<\/td>\n <td>P. Neto, A. Wan-Bissaka (og)<\/td>\n <td>64, 74′<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <tr>\n <td itemprop=\"awayTeam\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/SportsTeam\">\n <span itemprop=\"name\">WEST HAM<\/span>\n <\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">1<\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">33%<\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">13<\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">3<\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">1<\/td>\n <td>J. Bowen<\/td>\n <td>42′<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n <\/section>\n\n <script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n {\n \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n \"@type\": \"SportsEvent\",\n \"name\": \"Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 - 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense\",\n \"description\": \"Chelsea had 67% possession but only scraped a 2-1 win against West Ham. More possession than a politician has hot air, but was it enough? #BritishHumour #FootballAnalysis #PremierLeague\",\n \"image\": \"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/02\/fdb037d7a7e5213c9b66c40ad8b91dc4144bee6e182a6c7cf49b7018784906d4_en_2025-02-CHELSEA-WEST-HAM-match_statistics_match.png\",\n \"startDate\": \"\",\n \"location\": {\n \"@type\": \"StadiumOrArena\",\n \"name\": \"Stamford Bridge\"\n },\n \"homeTeam\": {\n \"@type\": \"SportsTeam\",\n \"name\": \"CHELSEA\"\n },\n \"awayTeam\": {\n \"@type\": \"SportsTeam\",\n \"name\": \"WEST HAM\"\n }\n }\n <\/script>\n <\/article>\n <\/body>\n <\/html>\n ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 – 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 – 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense Chelsea Edge Past West Ham: Tactical Masterclass or Just Plain Lucky, Mate? Blimey, Chelsea, with a frankly ludicrous 67% possession, almost bottled it against West […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":602,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-football"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/603\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/602"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}

{"id":603,"date":"2025-02-04T19:11:05","date_gmt":"2025-02-04T18:11:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/2025\/02\/04\/chelsea-vs-west-ham-2025-02-match\/"},"modified":"2025-02-04T19:11:05","modified_gmt":"2025-02-04T18:11:05","slug":"chelsea-vs-west-ham-2025-02-match","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/2025\/02\/04\/chelsea-vs-west-ham-2025-02-match\/","title":{"rendered":"CHELSEA-VS-WEST-HAM-2025-02-match"},"content":{"rendered":"\n \n \n \n \n \n Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 – 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense<\/title>\n <meta name=\"description\" content=\"Chelsea had 67% possession but only scraped a 2-1 win against West Ham. More possession than a politician has hot air, but was it enough? #BritishHumour #FootballAnalysis #PremierLeague\">\n \n \n <meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"website\">\n <meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 - 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense\">\n <meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Chelsea had 67% possession but only scraped a 2-1 win against West Ham. More possession than a politician has hot air, but was it enough? #BritishHumour #FootballAnalysis #PremierLeague\">\n <meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/02\/fdb037d7a7e5213c9b66c40ad8b91dc4144bee6e182a6c7cf49b7018784906d4_en_2025-02-CHELSEA-WEST-HAM-match_statistics_match.png\">\n\n \n <meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\">\n <meta name=\"twitter:title\" content=\"Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 - 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense\">\n <meta name=\"twitter:description\" content=\"Chelsea had 67% possession but only scraped a 2-1 win against West Ham. More possession than a politician has hot air, but was it enough? #BritishHumour #FootballAnalysis #PremierLeague\">\n <meta name=\"twitter:image\" content=\"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/02\/fdb037d7a7e5213c9b66c40ad8b91dc4144bee6e182a6c7cf49b7018784906d4_en_2025-02-CHELSEA-WEST-HAM-match_statistics_match.png\">\n\n <style>\n body { font-family: Arial, sans-serif; line-height: 1.6; max-width: 1200px; margin: 0 auto; padding: 20px; }\n table { width: 100%; border-collapse: collapse; margin: 20px 0; }\n th, td { padding: 12px; text-align: center; border: 1px solid #ddd; }\n th { background-color: #f5f5f5; }\n .stats-container { display: grid; grid-gap: 20px; }\n .video-wrapper { position: relative; padding-bottom: 56.25%; height: 0; overflow: hidden; max-width: 100%; }\n .video-wrapper iframe { position: absolute; top: 0; left: 0; width: 100%; height: 100%; }\n .highlight-green { background-color: #e6ffe6; }\n .highlight-red { background-color: #ffe6e6; }\n img { border-radius: 8px; margin: 20px 0; }\n <\/style>\n <\/head>\n <body>\n <article itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/SportsEvent\">\n <header>\n <h1 itemprop=\"name\">Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 – 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense<\/h1>\n <\/header>\n\n <section>\n <h2>Chelsea Edge Past West Ham: Tactical Masterclass or Just Plain Lucky, Mate?<\/h2>\n<p>Blimey, Chelsea, with a frankly ludicrous 67% possession, almost bottled it against West Ham! A squeaky 2-1 victory at Stamford Bridge \u2013 was it tactical genius or just a bit of jammy good fortune? Are the Blues genuine contenders, or are we just seeing Harry Kane’s trophy cabinet vibes all over again?<\/p>\n<p><strong>The 3 Keys to the Match<\/strong><\/p>\n<ol>\n<li><strong>Possession is Nine Tenths of the Law\u2026 Except When It Isn’t:<\/strong> Chelsea hogged the ball like they were auditioning for a Pep Guardiola tribute act, but struggled to break down a stubborn West Ham defence. All that possession, and for what? More cutting edge needed, pronto.<\/li>\n<li><strong>West Ham ‘Parking the Bus’ and Almost Getting Away With It:<\/strong> With a measly 33% possession, West Ham played on the counter like their lives depended on it. Their goal, a textbook smash and grab, nearly silenced Stamford Bridge. Almost pulled off the heist of the century!<\/li>\n<li><strong>Chelsea’s Late Show \u2013 Just About Good Enough:<\/strong> Going behind seemed to finally wake Chelsea up in the second half. The goals eventually came, but it was hardly a walk in the park. You’d expect a bit more swagger from a team chasing Champions League spots.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p><strong>The Bonkers Stat<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Zero offsides for Chelsea! For a team with that much of the ball, it’s frankly baffling. Perfect positional play, or just a lack of risk-taking and runs in behind? You decide.<\/p>\n<p><strong>Tags :<\/strong> Chelsea, West Ham, Premier League, Football, Analysis, Tactics, Possession, Goals, Stamford Bridge<\/p>\n <\/section>\n\n <section aria-label=\"Detailed Match\">\n <h2>Detailed Match<\/h2>\n <table>\n <tr>\n <th scope=\"col\">Stadium<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Type<\/th>\n <\/tr>\n <tr>\n <td itemprop=\"location\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/StadiumOrArena\">\n <span itemprop=\"name\">Stamford Bridge<\/span>\n <\/td>\n <td>Premier League<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/table>\n <\/section>\n\n\n <div style=\"width: 40%; margin: 0 auto;\">\n \n <figure class=\"wp-block-embed is-type-video is-provider-youtube wp-block-embed-youtube wp-embed-aspect-9-16 wp-has-aspect-ratio\">\n <div class=\"wp-block-embed__wrapper\">\n <iframe loading=\"lazy\" title=\"#CHEWHU Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 - 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense\" width=\"640\" height=\"480\" src=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/embed\/BxKBVNsZaB4?feature=oembed\" frameborder=\"0\" allow=\"accelerometer; autoplay; clipboard-write; encrypted-media; gyroscope; picture-in-picture; web-share\" referrerpolicy=\"strict-origin-when-cross-origin\" allowfullscreen><\/iframe>\n <\/div>\n <\/figure>\n \n <\/div>\n\n\n <section aria-label=\"Team Statistics\">\n <h2>Team Statistics<\/h2>\n <table>\n <thead>\n <tr>\n <th scope=\"col\">Team<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Score<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Possession (%)<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Total Shots<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Corners<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Offside<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Who put the ball in the net?<\/th>\n <th scope=\"col\">Goals<\/th>\n <\/tr>\n <\/thead>\n <tbody>\n <tr>\n <td itemprop=\"homeTeam\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/SportsTeam\">\n <span itemprop=\"name\">CHELSEA<\/span>\n <\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">2<\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">67%<\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">21<\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">4<\/td>\n <td class=\"green\">0<\/td>\n <td>P. Neto, A. Wan-Bissaka (og)<\/td>\n <td>64, 74′<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <tr>\n <td itemprop=\"awayTeam\" itemscope itemtype=\"https:\/\/schema.org\/SportsTeam\">\n <span itemprop=\"name\">WEST HAM<\/span>\n <\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">1<\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">33%<\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">13<\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">3<\/td>\n <td class=\"default\">1<\/td>\n <td>J. Bowen<\/td>\n <td>42′<\/td>\n <\/tr>\n <\/tbody>\n <\/table>\n <\/section>\n\n <script type=\"application\/ld+json\">\n {\n \"@context\": \"https:\/\/schema.org\",\n \"@type\": \"SportsEvent\",\n \"name\": \"Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 - 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense\",\n \"description\": \"Chelsea had 67% possession but only scraped a 2-1 win against West Ham. More possession than a politician has hot air, but was it enough? #BritishHumour #FootballAnalysis #PremierLeague\",\n \"image\": \"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/6\/2025\/02\/fdb037d7a7e5213c9b66c40ad8b91dc4144bee6e182a6c7cf49b7018784906d4_en_2025-02-CHELSEA-WEST-HAM-match_statistics_match.png\",\n \"startDate\": \"\",\n \"location\": {\n \"@type\": \"StadiumOrArena\",\n \"name\": \"Stamford Bridge\"\n },\n \"homeTeam\": {\n \"@type\": \"SportsTeam\",\n \"name\": \"CHELSEA\"\n },\n \"awayTeam\": {\n \"@type\": \"SportsTeam\",\n \"name\": \"WEST HAM\"\n }\n }\n <\/script>\n <\/article>\n <\/body>\n <\/html>\n ","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 – 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense Chelsea vs West Ham: Squeaky 2-1 Win! \ud83d\udd25 – 67% Possession, More Shots Than Sense Chelsea Edge Past West Ham: Tactical Masterclass or Just Plain Lucky, Mate? Blimey, Chelsea, with a frankly ludicrous 67% possession, almost bottled it against West […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":602,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-603","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-football"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/603","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=603"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/603\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/602"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=603"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=603"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/match.electrotuto.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=603"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}